Case Study / Plastic Surgery

Plastic surgery websites built for a long, careful decision.

Nobody books a surgeon the way they book a haircut. The decision takes months, involves a partner, a budget, and a lot of quiet research. This is how CreateX builds for that decision, and how we make sure a surgeon shows up in search and in AI answers while it is being made.

0.0%

is the average conversion rate on a plastic surgery website, against a 30 to 45% target for consults that actually happen.

Practice marketing benchmarks

0

pieces of content a prospective patient now consumes before requesting a consultation, up from four to six in 2023.

Patient journey research, 2026

0%

of patients research a procedure online before they ever call a practice. The site is the consultation before the consultation.

Patient behaviour data

0

minutes. Practices that respond to an enquiry inside that window are around three times more likely to convert it.

Lead response research

Our approach

How we build for a surgical decision, not an impulse.

Six phases. The whole site is designed around one uncomfortable truth: the person reading it is scared, and they are comparing you to three other surgeons in the same tab group.

Phase 01

We work out what you are actually known for

A surgeon who does everything is memorable for nothing. We find the procedures where your results, your training, and your local demand overlap, then build the site so that a stranger understands your specialism in about eight seconds.

  • Procedure mix by volume, by revenue, and by what you genuinely enjoy operating on
  • Your training, fellowship, and board certification, stated in language a patient understands
  • What competing surgeons in your market already own
  • The revision and complex cases that separate you from the practice down the road
Phase 02

We design for months of quiet research

Prospective patients now read eight to twelve pieces of content before they contact anyone, often over several months, mostly at night, usually without telling anybody. The site has to be worth returning to, not just worth landing on.

  • Deep procedure pages, not brochure pages, covering technique, candidacy, and honest limits
  • Recovery timelines told day by day, because that is the question that decides bookings
  • Cost explained with the components that move it, including anaesthesia and facility fees
  • Content that assumes the reader is comparing you to somebody else right now
16:9

Procedure page and recovery timeline

The long form procedure page with the day by day recovery section visible.

Phase 03

The gallery is the single most visited thing you own

Patients look for someone with their anatomy, not the best result you have ever had. A gallery that cannot be filtered by the things that matter to the viewer is a gallery that fails at its only job.

  • Filterable by procedure, technique, age, body type, and where relevant implant size or profile
  • Standardised angles, lighting, and distance so the comparison is honest
  • Consent recorded properly and revocable, with a workflow your staff can actually run
  • Time since surgery labelled on every set, because a two week photo is not a result
Phase 04

Credentials, stated so a patient can verify them

Board certified in what, by whom, and how would a nervous person confirm it. This distinction is the single most common source of patient confusion in the field, and being the practice that explains it clearly is a competitive advantage rather than a compliance chore.

  • Certification, fellowship, hospital privileges, and society memberships, each linked to the verifying body
  • The difference between board certified plastic surgeon and cosmetic surgeon, explained plainly
  • Where you operate, with what anaesthesia support, and what happens if something goes wrong
  • Real reviews and outcomes, presented within FTC rules on typicality
3:2

Surgeon profile / credentials

The bio page, or the surgeon in theatre and in consultation.

Phase 05

Make the first contact feel low stakes

The gap between reading and enquiring is the whole business. We reduce it with virtual consults, a photo upload option, clear pricing on the consult itself, and a response process that does not leave people waiting three days for an email.

  • Virtual consultation as a real path, not a buried afterthought
  • Enquiry forms that ask only what is needed to have the first conversation
  • Routing so enquiries reach a human quickly, since responding within five minutes roughly triples conversion
  • Practices with online scheduling convert notably more of the leads they already have
Phase 06

Track the funnel all the way to surgery

Consults are not the goal, operations are. We instrument the path from first visit to consult booked, consult kept, and case closed, so we can tell which content produces patients rather than which content produces traffic.

  • Attribution from first touch through to booked surgery, not just form fills
  • Consult show rate tracked separately from consult booking rate
  • Lead to surgery conversion measured against the roughly 22% typical benchmark
  • Content decisions made on what produced cases, not on what got clicks

What we take care of

The details that decide whether a patient trusts a surgeon.

In a market where every competitor claims excellence, credibility is built out of specifics. These are the specifics.

01

Consent that is documented and revocable

Before and after photos need consent that covers the web, social, and advertising separately, with a route for a patient to withdraw it later. We build the workflow, not just the checkbox.

Why it matters. Photo consent is separate from treatment consent, and using an image beyond the scope a patient agreed to is both a privacy exposure and a reputational one.

02

Results claims that stay inside FTC rules

No cherry picked reviews, no edited testimonials, no atypical results implied as typical. Disclosures go next to the claim, not in a footer nobody reads.

Why it matters. The FTC's revised Endorsement Guides took effect in July 2023, and the 2024 updates attached civil penalties that can reach tens of thousands of dollars per violation.

03

Ad creative that will actually run

We design the gallery for the site and separately design ad creative that can survive review, so the marketing does not depend on images the platforms will reject.

Why it matters. Meta restricts before and after and transformation style imagery in health and wellness advertising, and cosmetic surgery sees among the highest rejection rates of any category.

04

Cost pages that are honest about variability

Surgical pricing genuinely varies by anatomy, technique, and facility. We publish the range and its components rather than a single number that turns into an awkward conversation at consult.

Why it matters. Cost is one of the most searched aspects of every procedure, and the practice that answers it credibly earns the enquiry from the one that stonewalls.

05

Recovery content written honestly

Day three is worse than day one. Drains are unpleasant. Swelling lasts longer than people expect. Saying so builds more trust than any superlative, and it filters out patients who were never ready.

Why it matters. Recovery and downtime are consistently among the highest volume questions in surgical research, and honest answers are what get cited by AI systems and shared in forums.

06

Speed, despite an image heavy site

Galleries are what make surgical sites slow. We serve modern formats at sensible sizes, lazy load beyond the first screen, and keep the gallery interaction responsive on a phone.

Why it matters. Google's field thresholds are LCP under 2.5 seconds, INP under 200 milliseconds, and CLS under 0.1 at the 75th percentile of real loads.

07

Privacy for people who are not telling anyone

Many patients are researching without telling friends or family. Discreet enquiry handling, careful email subject lines, and no retargeting that follows them onto a shared device.

Why it matters. Careless remarketing on cosmetic procedures is one of the fastest ways to lose a patient permanently, and it raises real exposure under state health privacy laws.

08

Accessibility, including the enquiry form

WCAG 2.1 AA throughout, with the enquiry and booking flows keyboard tested, because those are the areas that draw complaints across healthcare sites.

Why it matters. Healthcare ranks among the top industries for web accessibility complaints, and booking and intake flows are the most cited failure points.

09

A site your team can keep accurate

Surgeons add procedures, change facilities, and update fees. If the site cannot be updated without a developer, it goes stale within a year and starts costing you credibility.

Why it matters. Outdated credentials or a discontinued procedure sitting live is a trust problem first and an SEO problem second.

21:9

Gallery system overview

The filterable before and after gallery, or the consent and photo standards workflow.

Search strategy

How we make a surgeon findable during the research phase.

Surgical search is high value, high competition, and slow to convert. The strategy is to be present at every stage of a months long decision rather than to win one keyword.

4:3

Search and enquiry dashboard

Procedure rankings, enquiry volume, and consult to surgery tracking.

Each procedure gets a genuine hub: the main page, technique variations, recovery, cost, candidacy, risks, and a filtered slice of the gallery. Thin procedure pages lose to practices that treat each operation as a subject worth a dozen pages. This is also what supports the eight to twelve content touches a patient now takes before enquiring.

'Plastic surgeon near me' and 'revision rhinoplasty specialist' need different pages and different proof. Local intent is served by the Google Business Profile, location pages, and reviews. Specialist intent is served by depth, case volume, and published expertise, and it will travel much further than your city.

Correct primary category, real photos, accurate hours, and a steady flow of recent reviews. For a surgical practice the profile is often where the first impression happens, and a neglected profile loses to an active one even when the website is stronger.

Prospective patients cross check you on RealSelf, on the society directories, on Google, and in forums. Those profiles need to be claimed, complete, and consistent with the site, because a gap between what your site says and what a directory says reads as a red flag on a decision this size.

Implant type comparisons, technique comparisons, and the board certification question drive enormous volume. Practices avoid them because they feel risky. Answering them honestly, including who you are not the right surgeon for, is what earns links, forum mentions, and AI citations.

Consultation style explainers, technique walkthroughs, and patient stories where consent allows. Practices using video report meaningfully higher consultation booking rates, and video also gives you the surgeon's manner, which is exactly what a nervous patient is trying to assess.

Traffic is a poor proxy in a market where the average site converts around 2.3% of visitors. We track enquiry, consult booked, consult attended, and case closed by source, and we optimise the stage that is actually leaking rather than the one that is easiest to report.

Answer engine optimisation

Patients now ask an assistant whether you are the right surgeon.

The questions people are embarrassed to ask a human, they ask a chatbot. That makes AI answers an unusually influential part of a surgical decision, and the systems answering them source their information very differently.

44.1%

of medical YMYL queries return an AI Overview

The explainer traffic is going away

Ahrefs found medical YMYL queries trigger AI Overviews at more than double the 20.5% baseline, and BrightEdge reported near total coverage on treatment and procedure queries through late 2025. The generic 'what is a rhinoplasty' article no longer earns the visit. What still earns it is specific, local, and demonstrably expert content.

What we do: shift procedure content from definition to judgement, technique choices, candidacy, and honest trade offs, which a summary cannot replace.

4:3

AI answer screenshot

An assistant answering a procedure question or a 'best surgeon in city' prompt.

01

Lead with the direct answer

Forty to sixty words at the top of every procedure page that answer the actual question: who is a candidate, what it costs, how long recovery takes. Then the depth for the human who is now three months into their research.

02

Write to the question, in the patient's words

'Can I have a tummy tuck if I want more children' is a real query and a real conversation. Headings phrased that way match how people talk to assistants, which is longer and more personal than how they type into a search box.

03

Cite, quantify, attribute

The Princeton and IIT Delhi study at KDD 2024 found citations, statistics, and quotations lifted visibility in generative answers by up to roughly 40%. In surgery that means referencing the literature and your own case volume rather than making unsupported superlative claims.

04

Structure the entity, not just the page

Physician and MedicalProcedure markup, consistent name, credentials and address everywhere, and society and hospital links that corroborate it. AI systems assemble an entity from many sources, and inconsistency is what makes them describe you vaguely or not at all.

05

Publish the things models can verify

Case volume, technique specifics, complication management, and named training. Verifiable specifics get repeated. Adjectives do not.

06

Monitor the prompts patients actually use

We check monthly what the assistants answer for your city plus your top procedures, for your name, and for your competitors. Where the answer is wrong, incomplete, or names someone else, that is a defined content and citation gap.

How we work

Built like a clinical site, sold like a considered purchase.

Our background is medical practice work, so we treat surgical marketing as something that has to be defensible: honest recovery content, consent that holds up, claims that stay inside FTC rules. That discipline is also what makes the content credible enough for search engines and AI systems to trust.

  • Scope Website, procedure architecture, gallery system, and enquiry funnel
  • Systems Virtual consults, enquiry routing, and consult to surgery tracking
  • Guardrails Photo consent workflow, FTC safe results claims, accessible forms
  • Ongoing Procedure content, local search, reputation, and AI visibility
4:3

Project showcase

Desktop and mobile of the site, or the gallery and procedure page together.

Start a conversation

Tell us what you operate on and we will show you the gaps.

Send us your site and your market. We will come back with where your procedure content is thin against competitors, where the enquiry funnel leaks, and what the AI assistants say today when someone asks who to see in your city.